[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [HD] Hammered Dulcimer vs Cimbalom

To: George Polkowski <gpolkowski@yahoo.com>, Hammered Dulcimers <hdlist@hammered-dulcimers.org>, Hammered Dulcimers <hdlist@hammered-dulcimers.org>
Subject: Re: [HD] Hammered Dulcimer vs Cimbalom
From: George Polkowski <gpolkowski@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 17:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of hdlist-bounces+davelovelace=gmail.com@hammered-dulcimers.org) smtp.mail=hdlist-bounces+davelovelace=gmail.com@hammered-dulcimers.org; dkim=neutral (bad format) header.i=@yahoo.com
Delivered-to: davelovelace@gmail.com
Delivered-to: hdlist@hammered-dulcimers.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1373846944; bh=yVf9CryQQYraWxXncftX4g/SMXnzuxhkfysn+Uw37Us=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mPK3pIi+r8KxXlxoW5JcSko7I/G/YSYxHL7uA80SGJ9BUhD6bsizgZtQy2GA0y2Fh2Ut5qoyUTpC5VqHJEzSoEt1I+KXU6b6LJNU8Hjp2XV32z9iYq9y8v6I5c8EVA2iS+f5j8WLsA5UiwmW3bTvbjsegdlfxxO7hD01Im8Bqh8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aroHIYovsaR6hnErATpYpA11m8liNP5cTOS4hNVlTyBrXgVDWjqf0r+VOd/ysNWBEiqrKdSNhe1ICweQk/aa9L+JgkPOCLfMCzodi/8AncpbJWdAfZuWZTINXOoesxtBsCsXEq49v6o6+BQAhY09D7LPRLYq/662vCMUJdzr/OY= ;
In-reply-to: <1373846852.39663.YahooMailNeo@web161502.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
List-archive: <http://www.hammered-dulcimers.org/pipermail/hdlist/>
List-help: <mailto:hdlist-request@hammered-dulcimers.org?subject=help>
List-id: Hammered Dulcimers <hdlist.hammered-dulcimers.org>
List-post: <mailto:hdlist@hammered-dulcimers.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.hammered-dulcimers.org/mailman/listinfo/hdlist>, <mailto:hdlist-request@hammered-dulcimers.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.hammered-dulcimers.org/mailman/options/hdlist>, <mailto:hdlist-request@hammered-dulcimers.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Old-return-path: <gpolkowski@yahoo.com>
References: <CAGuoowSioYFKCgutY9rdQ+Lm8UowMX9Jvc09S=Y4h79Cs3LmCw@mail.gmail.com> <1373846852.39663.YahooMailNeo@web161502.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: George Polkowski <gpolkowski@yahoo.com>, Hammered Dulcimers <hdlist@hammered-dulcimers.org>
Resent-message-id: 1FlVyaK0oKYVn_VHtBX8Rd1wYh_OFxzIqzE9Gp-4LAXp6s4G122FrKFDErUiWkNE@hammered-dulcimers.org
Sender: "Hdlist" <hdlist-bounces+davelovelace=gmail.com@hammered-dulcimers.org>
That instrument correctly spelled is a Hackbrett which I misspelled in the first sentence.

From: George Polkowski <gpolkowski@yahoo.com>
To: Hammered Dulcimers <hdlist@hammered-dulcimers.org>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: [HD] Hammered Dulcimer vs Cimbalom

You might also consider an Austrian/Bavarian Heackbrett.  My trapezoidal shaped instrument has four sets of strings per course.   The strings are arranged by ascending half tones, alternating on the left and right side of the instrument.  There is only one note for each set of strings (although I guess you could also choose to play the short string lengths between the tuning pins and the bridge).  Therefore,  there are just two bridges for the instrument, one running up each side of the instgrument.  My instrument has 32 notes running from a low G to a high D and I've only ever played one song that required just one additional note a half step away if the key is changed (33 consecutive half tones).  I enjoy playing this instrument because it is fully chromatic and the notes are arranged in ascending order as they are on a piano, but of course the piano keyboard has artificially created the black keys for sharps and flats.  There are also some more traditional hammered dulcimers using this string arrangement although it's not that common.
George Polkowski
Las Vegas, Nevada

From: Roland De Fleur <rolandefleur@gmail.com>
To: hdlist@hammered-dulcimers.org
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:09 AM
Subject: [HD] Hammered Dulcimer vs Cimbalom

This is just a sanity check on my understanding of the differences ... Please correct me where I have misunderstood.

Cimbalom casing is generally a rather heavy solid construction, intended for permanent floor stand mounting. This is due to the high tension stress requirements of 4-string courses of relatively low-guage (thick) strings. The tone resulting is more metallic and piano-like. The casement appears to be 4-8 inches thick. Range is designed to be extensive (more than the HD) from c2 to d6 chromatically. I have been unable to find any good documentation on either string layouts or general construction of an instrument on the internet (at least using the english google search engine). Cimbalom always has dampers because the rigidity of the instrument case/soundboard results in high sustain duration.

Hammered Dulcimer is intended to be a relatively portable instrument with a sweeter more 'harp-like' tone. It generally uses 2- or 3-string courses of medium to fine guage music wire with the lower courses using wound bronze strings. Most instruments are diatonically strung, chromatic layout varies from one manufacturer to another. The casement appears to be 3-6 inches thick. Range is from G3 to D6 but may increase in either direction depending on the design of the builder. Tone relies more on the selection of soundboard material and string size as the structure of the casement is less tolerant to higher string tensions. Dampers are provided on most high-end models.

I realize that traditionally different styles of music are performed on each of these instrument types, my interest is on the overall construction and resulting tone produced because of the choices made in the construction.

Do I understand the difference correctly, or am I way off in certain aspects?

Hdlist mailing list

Hdlist mailing list

Hdlist mailing list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>